ITC: retailer loyalty for kirana & general trade
Portfolio FMCG houses face a self-inflicted loyalty problem: each brand team runs its own scheme, the same outlet juggles competing internal programs, and the richest scheme cannibalises siblings. Meanwhile launch SKUs fight for shelf entry against the company's own established lines.
The challenge
ITC needed unified outlet engagement across a portfolio spanning staples to premium foods — preserving brand-level scheme autonomy while ending program fragmentation at the outlet, and accelerating launch placement through general trade.
What Unotag did
One-outlet-one-wallet architecture
Unotag built a single outlet identity earning across portfolio brands, with brand-level scheme attribution underneath. Brand teams kept scheme autonomy — budgets, structures, calendars — while the outlet experienced one coherent program. Internal cannibalisation became visible in data and manageable in design.
Cross-brand basket engineering
Portfolio breadth became the rewarded behaviour: basket multipliers for outlets stocking across categories (staples + snacks + premium lines), tuned so no single brand's scheme could dominate rational outlet attention.
Launch seeding system
Unotag productised launch placement: first-stock bonuses with shelf-photo verification, time-boxed seeding windows, and placement-velocity dashboards by territory. Launches entered general trade with a pull mechanism instead of pure distributor push.
Outlet-class targeting
Using billing-history clustering, Unotag derived outlet potential classes and matched scheme intensity to headroom — concentrating budget where share could grow rather than where billing already ran high.
Portfolio program governance
A program-level P&L across brands gave ITC visibility no per-brand scheme view offered: total outlet-level spend, cross-scheme interaction effects, and portfolio ROI against control outlets.
The value Unotag added
Fragmentation ended without centralising power
Brand autonomy survived; outlet chaos didn't. The wallet unified the experience while attribution kept brand accountability intact.
Launch placement became a repeatable system
Verified first-stock seeding turned each launch from a bespoke push campaign into a configured program motion with measured velocity.
Budget moved to headroom
Outlet-class targeting redirected scheme intensity toward growth-capable outlets — the same spend produced more share movement.
Portfolio-level intelligence
Cross-brand interaction data exposed cannibalisation and synergy patterns invisible to any single brand team.
What made it work
1. A shared wallet with brand attribution resolves the portfolio-program paradox.
2. Launch seeding with photographic proof beats launch discounts on both cost and signal.
3. Targeting by headroom, not by history, is where scheme ROI hides.
Facing the same challenge?
We'll mirror your channel in a sandbox within 48 hours — email support@unomok.com.